ARCENEAUX ET AL.

v.

PFISTER

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1986)
  …y, 62 Cal. 2d 692, 401 P. 2d 382 (1965) (on rehearing, rejecting discrimination claim; reversing sentence), cert. denied, 386 U. S. 938 (1967); People v. Hillery, 65 Cal. 2d 795, 423 P. 2d 208 (1967) (after remand, affirming sentence), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 986 (1968); In re Hillery, 71 Cal. 2d 857, 457 P. 2d 565 (1969) (on original petition for habeas corpus, reversing sentence); People v. Hillery, 10 Cal. 3d 897, 519 P. 2d 572 (1974) (after remand, reducing sentence); In re Hillery, Crim. No. 20424 (Cal.…
• United States v. Harris, 542 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …ied, 419 U.S. 937, 95 S.Ct. 207, 42 L.Ed.2d 164. Indeed, it has been held that a conviction for conspiracy may rest on proof of an overt act not charged in the indictment. Brulay v. United States, 383 F. 2d 345, 350-51 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986, 88 S.Ct. 469, 19 L.Ed.2d 478. It is not necessary for the Government to prove each overt act alleged. United States v. Vittoria, 284 F. 2d 451 (7th Cir. 1960), overruled as to another ground, United States v. White, 405 F. 2d 838, 848 n.16 (7th Cir…
• United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …nces. Implicit in these prohibitions, taken together, is that they apply extraterritorially. See United States v. Bowman, 260 U.S. 94, 98, 43 S.Ct. 39, 41, 67 L.Ed. 149 (1922); Brulay v. United States, 383 F. 2d 345, 349-50 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986, 88 S.Ct. 469,19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967). As we said in United States v. Cadena, 585 F. 2d at 1259, “Congress intended that [21 U.S.C. § 963] apply to persons who commit[ted] acts or a series of acts that at least commenced outside the territorial limits…