FIDUCIARY COUNSEL, INC.

v.

WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By

• J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 406 F.2d 1017 (4th Cir. 1968)
  …Labor Relations Act and discriminatorily discharged 71 employees. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sustained the Board and [*1019] enforced its order with modifications. J. P. Stevens & Co. v. NLRB, 380 F. 2d 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 564, 19 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967). Stevens II embraced the company’s conduct from September 1964 through May 1965. The Board found that the company repeatedly violated the Act and unlawfully discharged 18 employees. Again the Court of Appeals f…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Teamsters Local 115 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 640 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …ative, at the option of the employer. The court was satisfied that such a reading “still guarantees effective communication of the Board’s order to the Company’s employees.” J.P. Stevens & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 380 F. 2d 292, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 564, 19 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967). The Board acquiesced in such a modification in a subsequent case, acknowledging that a public reading by a Board representative sufficed to effectuate the policies of the Act. Textile Workers v. N.L.R.B., 388…
• Lipman Motors, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 451 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …the requested meeting of employees. But we note that in the past this relief also has been limited to undoing the effect of egregious unfair labor practices. See, e. g., J. P. Stevens & Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 F. 2d 292, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 564, 19 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967). Here too, the Board did not exceed its broad discretion in denying the Union’s request. Petitions for review denied; order enforced. . The Company and the Union, with the approval of the Acting Regional Direct…