UNITED STATES

v.

BECKHAM

Citator

Cited By

• Schlegel v. The United States, 416 F.2d 1372 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …whether the employee’s removal was accomplished in an arbitrary or capricious manner or was consummated without substantial evidence to support such action. Beckham v. United States, 375 F. 2d 782, 785, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, 543-544 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1011, 88 S.Ct. 583, 19 L.Ed.2d 613. Moreover, in considering the issues of arbitrariness and lack of substantial evidence, we are entitled to review all available evidence, including de novo evidence taken before one of our commissioners, as well as the…
• Brown v. The United States, 396 F.2d 989 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …R REVIEW OF THE TRIAL COMMISSIONER’S ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PRECLUDE THE ADMISSION OF DE NOVO EVIDENCE DAVIS, Judge. In Beckham v. United States, 375 F. 2d 782, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, petition for writ of certiorari dismissed by stipulation, 389 U.S. 1011, 88 S.Ct. 583, 19 L.Ed. 2d 613 (1967),1 we rejected the Government’s revived contention that, in reviewing service decisions on military disability-retirement pay, this court must limit its consideration to the administrative record and may not take…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Beckham v. The United States, 392 F.2d 619 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …cisions of the medical boards and the Navy Correction Board were arbitrary, erroneous in law, and not based upon substantial evidence. The court rendered a decision (Beckham v. United States, 375 F. 2d 782, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, pet. for cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 1011, 88 S.Ct. 583, 19 L.Ed.2d 613 (1967)), and held essentially three things: (1) the Navy waiver statute (see fn. 2, supra) only applied to “civilian incurred” injuries; (2) the Navy’s definition of “organic defect” is reasonable; and .(3) the Trial Co…