ROWLAND

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. James v. Placek, 546 F.2d 1298 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …d States v. Dillon, 436 F. 2d 1093, 1095 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. McCarthy, 470 F. 2d 222, 224 (6th Cir. 1972); Fotie v. United States, 137 F. 2d 831, 839 (8th Cir. 1943); Singleton v. United States, 381 F. 2d 1, 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 601, 19 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967); Havelock v. United States, 427 F. 2d 987, 991 (10th Cir.), [*1305] cert. denied, 400 U.S. 946, 91 S.Ct. 252, 27 L.Ed.2d 251 (1970). . People v. Kirkwood, 17 Ill.2d 23, 160 N.E. 2d 766, 771 (1959), cert. denied,…
• Lonzo Nutter v. United States, 412 F.2d 178 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …ticularly complains — was pertinent to the entrapment issue, which was then still in the case. Both felony priors were admissible to impeach the appellant as to his credibility. Singleton v. United States, 381 F. 2d 1, 4 (9 Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 601, 19 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967); Helberg v. United States, 365 F. 2d 314, 316 (9 Cir. 1966). The jury was so instructed. Appellant urges this court to reexamine the rule of this circuit, and to hold that the admission of the two prior convicti…
• United States v. Marlin Ronald Belperio, 452 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …at he had been convicted of another burglary. In these circumstances, even though the issue had been presented to the trial court, the elicited statement would not be prejudicial. Singleton v. United States, 381 F. 2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 601, 19 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967). The same is true of the statement of another police officer, likewise made on cross-examination, that he had previously arrested appellant “for a felony”. The trial judge forthwith instructed the jury to ignore…