ARKANSAS
v.
TENNESSEE

U.S. | 1968-01-15
No. 33
389 U.S. 1026 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Arkansas filed a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against Tennessee in the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, which the Court granted, appointing a Special Master to oversee discovery and evidence-gathering proceedings and directing Tennessee to answer within sixty days. The Court established procedural rules for the case, including provisions for the Special Master's expenses and authority to manage subsequent litigation steps, with costs to be apportioned among the parties as the Court would later determine.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the State of Tennessee allowed sixty days to answer. It Is Ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.

It Is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Arkansas v. Tennessee, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 68 (U.S. 1970)
    …miles laterally along the west (Arkansas side) bank of the Mississippi River and encompasses some five thousand acres. This Court's jurisdiction arises under Art. Ill, § 2, of the Constitution of the United States. On January 15, 1968, we appointed, 389 U. S. 1026, Hon. Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior United States Judge of the District of Minnesota, as Special Master to determine the state line in the disputed area [*89] known as Cow Island Bend in the Mississippi River located between Crittenden County, Arkansas,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw