AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, INC., ET AL.

v.

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL. V. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS, INC. V. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1969)
  …or less than a year is not based on any permissible purpose but is solely designed, as “Connecticut states quite frankly,” “to protect its fisc by discouraging entry of those who come needing relief.” Id., at 336-337. We noted probable jurisdiction. 389 U. S. 1032 (1968). In No. 33, there are four appellees. Three of them— appellees Harrell, Brown, and Legrant — applied for and were denied AFDC aid. The fourth, appellee Barley, applied for and was denied benefits under the program for Aid to the Permanently…
• Am. Commercial Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 392 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1968)
  …§ 15a (3) as the primary guide to ICC resolution of rate controversies involving intermodal competition, we noted probable jurisdiction of the appeal taken by the Commission and the competing carriers from the decision of the District [*575] Court.1 389 U. S. 1032 (1968). For the reasons detailed below, we conclude that the District Court erred in its rejection of the Commission’s decision, and the grounds on which it was based, and we reverse. I. Since 1953 the movement of ingot molds from Neville Island a…