AYERS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1978)
  …Martinez, 435 F. Supp. 690 (EDNY 1977) (defendant has standing to object to search of co-defendant’s person at airport because defendant was lawfully present at time of search), with Sumrall v. United States, 382 F. 2d 651 (CA10 1967), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 1055 (1968) (defendant did not have standing to object to search of codefendant’s purse even though defendant present at time of search). Compare Holloway v. Wolff, 482 F. 2d 110 (CA8 1973) (defendant has standing to object to search of bedroom in hous…
• United States v. Simpson, 453 F.2d 1028 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …search of a totally unrelated object which provides grounds for prosecution of a crime different than that which the accused was arrested for does not render the search invalid. Sumrall v. United States, 382 F. 2d 651 (10th Cir. 1967), cert, denied 389 U.S. 1055, 88 S.Ct. 806, 19 L.Ed.2d 853 (1968); Massey v. United States, 358 F. 2d 782 (10th Cir. 1966), cert, denied 385 U.S. 878, 87 S.Ct. 159, 17 L.Ed.2d 105 (1966); Cook v. United States, 346 F. 2d 563 (10th Cir. 1965). Thus when Simpson’s wallet was sear…
• United States v. Chrzanowski, 502 F.2d 573 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …from the F.B.I. with which to make payments to the appellants. Since there was no evidence of entrapment, the trial judge correctly ruled that the instruction was not necessary, United States v. Giuliano, 383 F. 2d 30 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1055, 88 S.Ct. 805, 19 L.Ed.2d 852 (1967); United States v. Aloisio, 440 F. 2d 705 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 824, 92 S.Ct. 49, 30 L.Ed.2d 51 (1971). Appellants next contend that the trial court committed plain error in refusing to have certain…