SMITH
v.
NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
SMITH
NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
390 U.S. 143
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F. 2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F. 2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cates v. United States, 451 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1971)…4] surrender those rights.” Id. at 664 n. 1 (emphasis added). Importantly, we did not hold that a failure to reserve rights expressly surrendered those rights, but rather we followed the intent of the parties. In Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp., 1968, 390 U.S. 143, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 the Supreme Court remanded for further consideration in light of Billiot. In Petroleum Carrier Corp. v. Carter, 5 Cir., 1956, 233 F. 2d 402, this Court held that the instrument in question had not released the joint to…
Authorities Cited
- Mrs. Chester Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Loffland Bros. Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Becker Cnty. Sand & Gravel Co., 373 F.2d 528 (4th Cir. 1967)