GARAFOLO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …onstrates that the district judge properly excused the juror. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c); United States v. Cameron, 464 F. 2d 333 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States v. Garafolo, 385 F. 2d 200, 207-208 (7th Cir. 1967), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 390 U.S. 144, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 [*38] (1968); United States v. Ellenbogen, 365 F. 2d 982, 989 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 923, 87 S.Ct. 892, 17 L.Ed.2d 795 (1967). Moreover, it is well established that trial judges exercise their discretion…
• United States v. Baker, 419 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …versible error; they base their contentions on two Supreme Court cases in which the Court required prosecution witnesses to reveal their residences. See Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 956 (1968); Garafolo v. United States, 390 U.S. 144, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968), rev’g 385 F. 2d 200 (7th Cir.1967). But Smith and Garafolo are easily distinguishable, for in neither of these cases did the government witness furnish any specific justification for refusing to reveal his res…
• United States v. Teller, 412 F.2d 374 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …the defendant was denied effective cross-examination. It is clear from the recital of Washington’s testimony that the district court did not unduly limit cross-examination of Washington’s past record. Moreover, nothing in United States v. Garafolo, 390 U.S. 144, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968), requires reversal. In Garafolo, the government witness had not been permitted to testify what his address was. On appeal, United States v. Garafolo, 385 F. 2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967), this court independently examin…

  ← 1 / 2 →