COSTELLO
v.
UNITED STATES
COSTELLO
UNITED STATES
390 U.S. 201
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Upon the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut for such disposition as law and justice require.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Pacelli, 491 F.2d 1108 (2d Cir. 1974)…ce of acts designed to show illegal activity on the part of the conspirators themselves. See United States v. Lutwak, 344 U.S. 604, 73 S.Ct. 481, 97 L.Ed. 593 (1952); United States v. Costello, 352 F. 2d 848 (2d Cir. 1965), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 201, 88 S.Ct. 898, 19 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1968). The purpose of the evidence was to get before the jury the fact that various persons other than Lipsky, who had been closely associated with Paeelli, believed Paeelli to be guilty of having murdered Parks. Inde…
-
United States v. Franzese, 392 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1968)…ofar as this charge lumped acts with declarations, it was too favorable to the defense. See Lutwak v. United States, supra, 344 U.S. at 617-619, 73 S.Ct. 481; United States v. Costello, 352 F. 2d 848, 853-854 (2 Cir. 1965), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 201, 88 S.Ct. 898, 19 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1968). Here the post-September 30 evidence seems to have consisted almost solely of acts.…