LOOKRETIS
v.
UNITED STATES
LOOKRETIS
UNITED STATES
390 U.S. 338
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18, and Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.
Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Knox, 396 U.S. 77 (U.S. 1969)…his choice involuntary for purposes of the Fifth Amendment. [*82] For this proposition Knox relies on United States v. Lookretis, 398 F. 2d 64 (C. A. 7th Cir. 1968), where, after this Court had remanded for reconsideration in light of Marchetti, see 390 U. S. 338 (1968), the Court of Appeals ruled that truthful disclosures made under the compulsion of § 4412 could not be introduced against their maker in a criminal proceeding. However, the Fifth Amendment was offended in Lookretis precisely because the defe…
-
United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971)…unication is protected by the first amendment, Angelini’s telephonic communication of such information is similarly protected. We rejected such an assertion in United States v. Lookretis, 385 F. 2d 487, 489 (7th Cir. 1967), vacated on other grounds, 390 U. S. 338, 88 S.Ct. 1097, 19 L.Ed.2d 1219 (1968), and we again reject it. Angelini's first amendment claim erroneously proceeds on the implicit assumption that the known use and purpose of communication is not relevant to the determination of whether the comm…
-
United States v. Hanon, 428 F.2d 101 (8th Cir. 1970)…e Fifth Amendment. In rejecting this argument, the Court states: “For this proposition Knox relies on United States v. Lookretis, 398 F. 2d 64 (C.A. 7th Cir. 1968), where, after this Court had remanded for reconsideration in light of Marchetti, see 390 U.S. 338, [88 S.Ct. 1097, 19 L.Ed.2d 1219] (1968), the Court of Appeals ruled that truthful disclosures made under the compulsion of § 4412 could not be introduced against their maker in a criminal proceeding. However, the Fifth Amendment was offended in Loo…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1967)