MCBRIDE
v.
SMITH, COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
MCBRIDE
SMITH, COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
390 U.S. 411
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for rehearing is granted and the order of May 29, 1967, denying certiorari is vacated. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further consideration in light of Schneider v. Smith, ante, p. 17, in accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the entire record.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Schlesinger, 513 F.2d 462 (D.C. Cir. 1975)…2). See also Schneider v. Smith, 390 U.S. 17, 88 S.Ct. 682, 19 L.Ed.2d 799 (1967); Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 81 S.Ct. 1743, 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); McBride v. Roland, 369 F. 2d 65 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated and remanded, 390 U.S. 411, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1271, on remand, 405 F. 2d 1057 (1968). . In re Robert Paul Smith, No. OSD 66-47 (West. Field Office June 1, 1967). . In re Robert Paul Smith, No. OSD 66-47 (Appeal Board Nov. 8, 1967). . Smith was denied reconsideratio…
-
McBRIDE v. Willard J. Smith (substituted for E. J. Roland), 405 F.2d 1057 (2d Cir. 1968)…LY, Circuit Judge: This appeal by the Commandant, United States Coast Guard, from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York raises a close question about the proper course of action under the mandate of the Supreme Court, 390 U.S. 411, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1271 (1968), remanding the case to the district court. The action arose under the Magnuson Act, 50 U.S.C. § 191, which provides in part that whenever the President finds that “the security of the United States is [*1058]…
-
McKEAND v. Laird, 490 F.2d 1262 (9th Cir. 1973)…re without merit. Affirmed. . The government suggests that a lesser test might be applied and refers to 5 U.S.C. § 554(a)(4). See McBride v. Roland, 248 F. Supp. 459, 465 (S.D.N.Y.1965), aff’d 369 F. 2d 65 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 411, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1271 (1968). . The district court held that “[t]he record contains substantial evidence, if such is required, to support the findings of the Appeal Board and the final determination of that Board . . . .” In that record,…