MCSURELY ET AL.
v.
RATLIFF ET AL.
MCSURELY ET AL.
RATLIFF ET AL.
390 U.S. 412
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, post, p. 914, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McSURELY v. McCLELLAN, 697 F.2d 309 (D.C. Cir. 1982)…on, and ordered the appellant Thomas B. Ratliff (Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, Kentucky) to hold the seized material in safekeeping pending final disposition of the case. McSurely v. McClellan, 282 F.Supp. 848 (E.D.Ky.1967), app. dismissed, 390 U.S. 412, 88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272 (1968). The state prosecutor subsequently made these papers available to a Senate subcommittee investigating riots which occurred in Nashville, Tennessee earlier that year. In 1969, the McSurelys sued Senator John L.…1 / 2
-
McSURELY v. McCLELLAN, 553 F.2d 1277 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…further, cumulative demonstration that the three-judge court never meant its custody order to be a secrecy order. . Stip. 13, App. 21. . See 389 U.S. 949, 88 S.Ct. 313, 19 L.Ed.2d 358 (1967). . 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845, 19 L.Ed.2d 974 (1968). . 390 U.S. 412, 88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272 (1968). . “After the decision of the [three-judge] District Court and before the time for appeal had expired, subpoenas duces tecum ordering production of certain of the seized documents were issued [16 October 1967]…
-
McSURELY v. Ratliff, 398 F.2d 817 (6th Cir. 1968)…terial, or copies thereof, as the Committee considers pertinent to the inquiry, but in a manner to keep the materials intact for use in the event of appeal. The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal for want of jurisdiction. McSurely et al. v. Ratliff, 390 U.S. 412, 88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272. The stay order previously granted by the Supreme Court was continued in effect pending an appeal to this Court. Two other orders of the Supreme Court are reported at 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845, 19 L.Ed.2d 974 and 389…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence