ATLANTIC INSURANCE CO. ET AL.
v.
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA
ATLANTIC INSURANCE CO. ET AL.
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA
390 U.S. 529
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. S. Ins. Co. v. State, 674 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…decisions from other states concerning a Texas statute substantially similar to the Georgia statute involved in this case. See Atlantic Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 62 Cal.Rptr. 784, 255 Cal.App.2d 1 (1967), appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 390 U.S. 529, 88 S.Ct. 1208, 20 L.Ed.2d 86 (1968); Republic Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 212 Minn. 325, 138 N.W. 2d 776 (1965); Employers Casualty Co. v. Hobbs, 152 Kan. 815, 107 P. 2d 715 (1940). See also Republic Ins. Co. v. Oakley, 637 S.W. 2d 448, 4…
-
W. & S. Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal., 451 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1981)…rd, Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 4 Cal. App. 3d, at 34, 84 Cal. Rptr., at 96; Atlantic Ins. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 255 Cal. App. 2d 1, 4, 62 Cal. Rptr. 784, 786 (1967), cert. denied and appeal dism’d, 390 U. S. 529 (1968). Many may doubt the wisdom of California’s retaliatory tax; indeed, the retaliatory tax has often been criticized as a distortion of the tax system and an impediment to the raising of revenue from the taxation of insurance. See, e. g., Counc…1 / 2
-
United States v. Bruton, 416 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1969)…he truth.” 394 U.S. at 174-175, 89 S.Ct. at 967. We find additional support for our conclusion that appellant lacked standing in a case not cited by the parties, People v. Varnum, 66 Cal.2d 208, 59 Cal.Rptr. 108, 427 P. 2d 772 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 529, 88 S.Ct. 1208, 20 L.Ed.2d 86 (1968). There, police secured incriminating evidence from one co-defendant in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. The court, speaking through Chief Justice Traynor, held that another co-defendant, who was…