TIMES MIRROR CO.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1968-04-22
No. 1162
Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
390 U.S. 712 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • The Morning Pioneer, Inc. v. The Bismarck Tribune Co., 493 F.2d 383 (8th Cir. 1974)
    …f the Sherman Act, makes it unlawful to “attempt to monopolize * * * any part of the trade or commerce among the several states * * 15 U.S.C. § 2 (1970). . See, United States v. Times Mirror Company, 274 F.Supp. 606, 618 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff’d mem., 390 U.S. 712, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 252 (1968) ; Roberts, Antitrust Problems in the Newspaper Industry, 82 Harv.L.Rev. 319, 320-322 (1968). See also, United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 572, 86 S.Ct. 1698, 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966), where the Supreme…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw