SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
390 U.S. 744
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. Wadmond, 401 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1971)
-
Connell v. Higginbotham, 403 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1971)…U. S. Const., Art, VI, cl. 3. The validity of this section of the oath would appear settled. See Knight v. Board of Regents, 269 F. Supp. 339 (1967), aff’d per curiam, 390 U. S. 36 (1968); Hosack v. Smiley, 276 F. Supp. 876 (1967), aff’d per curiam, 390 U. S. 744 (1968); Ohlson v. Phillips, 304 F. Supp. 1152 (1969), aff’d per curiam, 397 U. S. 317 (1970). The second portion of the oath, approved by the District Court, falls within the ambit of decisions of this Coúrt proscribing summary dismissal from publi…
-
Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. 676 (U.S. 1972)…e of political ties, group affiliations, or beliefs. Compare Connell v. Higginbotham, 403 U. S. 207 (1971); Knight v. Board of Regents, 269 F. Supp. 339 (SDNY 1967), aff’d, 390 U. S. 36 (1968); Hosack v. Smiley, 276 F. Supp. 876 (Colo. 1967), aff’d, 390 U. S. 744 (1968); Ohlson v. Phillips, 304 F. Supp. 1152 (Colo. 1969), aff’d, 397 U. S. 317 (1970), with Whitehill v. Elkins, 389 U. S. 54 (1967); Baggett v. Bullitt, supra; Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, 368 U. S. 278 (1961); Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence