BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN & ENGINEMEN

v.

BANGOR & AROOSTOOK RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL. V. AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN V. AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL.; AND BANGOR & AROOSTOOK RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN & ENGINEMEN

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• The Wilderness Soc'y v. Rogers C. B. Morton, 479 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …s a duty to ignore that construction should it determine that it is “in conflict with the plain intent of the legislature.” Brhd of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt R. Co., 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59, 90, 385 F. 2d 581, 612 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 923, 88 S.Ct. 851, 19 L.Ed.2d 983 (1968).51 “Administrative interpretations are not absolute rules of law which must necessarily be followed in every instance, but are only helpful guides to aid courts in their task of statutory construction.” Sims v. U…
• The Del. & Hudson Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 450 F.2d 603 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …the procedures of the RLA; and that the BLF&E could not strike until those procedures were exhausted. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barber-ton Belt Railroad Co., 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59, 385 F. 2d 581 (1967), as amended 1968, cert, denied 390 U.S. 923, 88 S.Ct. 851, 19 L.Ed.2d 983 (1968). In mid-1968 the parties invoked the services of the National Mediation Board as provided under the Act.7 Several rounds of negotiation proved unsuccessful and on November 4, 1969, after advising the parties of…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Alton & S. Ry. Co. v. Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, 463 F.2d 872 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …anged in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Brotherhood of R. Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt R. Co., 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59, 71, 385 F. 2d 581, 593 (1967), cert. denied, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen etc. v. Bangar and Aroostock R. Co., 390 U.S. 923, 88 S.Ct. 851, 856, 19 L.Ed.2d 983 (1968). As to this requirement of the Act, it makes no difference whether the work rules are adopted by voluntary agreement of the parties, or by mandate of an arbitration procedure consented by the parties, or by…