GAINES

v.

OHIO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Calvert, 523 F.2d 895 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …2, 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975) (upholding jury determination that a mailing of twelve miles between [*904] broker’s office and insurance company was reasonably foreseeable); Bannister v. United States, 379 F. 2d 750, 752—753 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 861, 19 L.Ed.2d 988 (1968) (mailings from local insurance agent to home office reasonably foreseeable). In support of his assertion that the mailings and use of the wires were not “for the purpose of executing the scheme,” the defendant c…
• United States v. Haimowitz, 725 F.2d 1561 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …solely on the basis of intra-departmental mailings is an overly-broad interpretation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. This Court finds that the requirements of § 1341 have been met. See Bannister v. United States, 379 F. 2d 750 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 861, 19 L.Ed.2d 988 (1968) (§ 1341 violation when office communications were mailed between a Jacksonville insurance agency and the home office in New York); Blachly v. United States, 380 F. 2d 665, 671 (5th Cir. 1967) (“The crime of mail…
• United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …), where the court upheld a jury determination that a mailing was reasonably foreseeable between a broker’s [*677] office and an insurance company twelve miles away, and Bannister v. United States, 379 F. 2d 750, 752-753 (5 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 861, 19 L.Ed.2d 988 (1968), where the court held a mailing from a local insurance agent to his home office was reasonably foreseeable. In United States v. Britton, 500 F. 2d 1257 (8 Cir. 1974), the defendant was convicted of mail fraud in…