THOMPSON

v.

MACHROWICZ, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Hassler v. Casper Weinberger, 502 F.2d 172 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …tal impairment,4 and, second, that, due to this impairment, he is unable “to engage in any substantial gainful activity.” 5 Stark v. Weinberger, 497 F. 2d 1092 (7th Cir. 1974); Pierce v. Gardner, 388 F. 2d 846, 847-848 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 928, 88 S.Ct. 865, 19 L.Ed.2d 992 (1968). Insofar as physical impairment is conceimed, upon which Hassler relied when he commenced the long trail seeking disability benefits, we would have no trouble in determining that there was substantial evidence s…
• Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …Jeralds v. Richardson, 445 F. 2d 36 (7th Cir. 1971). In addition, the applicant would have to establish that the impairment is severe enough to preclude substantial gainful activity. Pierce v. Gardner, 388 F. 2d 846 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied in 390 U.S. 928, 88 S.Ct. 865, 19 L.Ed.2d 992, and 393 U.S. 885, 89 S.Ct. 197, 21 L.Ed.2d 162. In the case of children’s benefits these requirements would apply at age 22 and up to the time of application. Futernick v. Richardson, supra. Appellant argues that our…