WASHINGTON ET AL.

v.

HARRELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1969)
  …Supp. 22 (1967). The majority rested its decision on the ground that the one-year requirement was unconstitutional as a denial of the right to equal protection secured by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We noted probable jurisdiction. 390 U. S. 940 (1968). In No. 34, there are two appellees, Smith and Foster, who were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for a year prior to their applications as required by § 432 (6) of the [*626] Pennsylvania We…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish R.R. Co., 393 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1968)
  …brought suit before a three-judge District Court to enjoin and to set aside the Commission’s order. The District Court set aside the Commission’s order and remanded the case for further proceedings. 270 F. Supp. 695. We noted probable jurisdiction. 390 U. S. 940. Both Northern and Southern lines used Rail Form A as their basic formula, that form being a rail freight formula for determining freight service costs which utilizes the expenses and statistics for a given year as reported to the Commission by the…