REHMAN ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Wilson v. Clark, 414 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …ven by mail does not entitle the party to the three-day extension allowed by Rule 6(e). See United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easement & Right of Way, 386 F. 2d 769 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied sub nom., Skaggs v. United States, 390 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 1034, 19 L.Ed.2d 1137 (1968). Accord, Pizzichil v. Motors Ins. Corp., 90 F.R.D. 119, 121 (E.D.Pa. 1981). Professor Moore amplifies the above rule with the observations that even though the operative statute or regulation provides that…
• Mainer v. Canal Auth. OF the State of Fla., 467 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 1985)
  …9 S.E. 731 (1925)). Our holding is consistent with other jurisdictions’ decisions on the same issue. See Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 287 U.S. 315, 53 S.Ct. 177, 77 L.Ed. 331 (1932); Higginson v. United States, 384 F. 2d 504 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 1034, 19 L.Ed.2d 1137 (1968); Beistline v. City of San Diego, 256 F. 2d 421 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 865, 79 S.Ct. 96, 3 L.Ed.2d 98 (1958); O’Hara v. District of Columbia, 147 F. 2d 146 (D.C. Cir.1944), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 855…
• Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F.2d 956 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …1344, 1345 (9th Cir.1982) (Labor Management Relations Act’s requirement that the terms of a welfare trust fund be set forth in writing precludes oral modification); Lewis v. Seanor Coal Co., 382 F. 2d 437, 443-44 (3d Cir.1967) (same), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 1035, 19 L.Ed.2d 1137 (1968).6 The conclusion that under ERISA oral modifications of employee benefit plans are impermissible is buttressed by the observation that Congress expressly prohibited informal written amendments of ERISA plans.…