WHITTY

v.

WISCONSIN

Citator

Cited By

• Admiral Theatre Corp. v. The Douglas Theatre Co., 585 F.2d 877 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., 268 F. 2d 246 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 885, 80 S.Ct. 156, 4 L.Ed.2d 121 (1959); Seago v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc., 42 F.R.D. 627 (E.D.N.C.1966), aff’d, 388 F. 2d 987 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 959, 88 S.Ct. 1039,19 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1968). Contra, Cinema-Tex Enterprises v. Santikos Theatres, Inc., 414 F.Supp. 640 (W.D.Tex.1975), aff’d in part & rev’d in part, 535 F. 2d 932 (5th Cir. 1976). We refrain from deciding whether the theatre split in th…
• Atwell v. State OF Ark., 426 F.2d 912 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …Monder v. Ragen, 154 F. 2d 290 (7th Cir. 1946). And ordinarily ha beas corpus being a collateral attack is not considered to be a proper remedy for correcting errors in trial procedure. Durham v. Haynes, 368 F. 2d 989 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 959, 88 S.Ct. 1054, 19 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1968); Wilson v. Nebraska, 316 F. 2d 84, 86 (8th Cir. 1963); United States v. Sobell, 314 F. 2d 314, 324 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857, 83 S.Ct. 1906, 10 L.Ed.2d 1077. It is only where the trial errors o…
• Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Ga. Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …easonably” extended in time or distance its restrictive effect on competition will be deemed impermissibly burdensome. See Seago v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc., 42 F.R.D. 627, 640 (E.D.N.Y.1966), aff’d, 388 F. 2d 987 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 959, 88 S.Ct. 1039, 19 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1968); Orbo Theatre Corp. v. Loew’s, Inc., 156 F.Supp. 770, 778 (D.D.C.1957), aff’d, 261 F. 2d 380 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 943, 79 S.Ct. 725, 3 L.Ed.2d 677 (1959).v The evidence concerning clearances d…