ANDREWS, AKA TURQE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Salazar, 485 F.2d 1272 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …thin the discretion of the trial judge. United States v. Bentvena, 193 F.Supp. 485, 498-499 (S.D.N.Y.1960); United States v. Bonanno, 177 F.Supp. 106, 119 (S.D.N.Y.1959). See also United States v. Andrews, 381 F. 2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 1058, 19 L.Ed.2d 1156 (1968). Similar broad discretion is left to the trial judge in granting an adjournment. See United States v. Bonanno, supra, 177 F.Supp. at 121. In light of these well-established and oft-stated principles, we do not…
• United States v. Leibowitz, 420 F.2d 39 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …ding the over-use of hearsay-evidence in the presentation of government cases to grand juries, but we have consistently upheld indictments based upon hearsay evidence. See, e. g., United States v. Andrews, 381 F. 2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967) , cert. denied 390 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 1058, 19 L.Ed.2d 1156 (1968); United States v. Beltram, 388 F. 2d 449 (2d Cir. 1968) , cert. denied sub nom. Colon v. United States, 391 U.S. 955, 88 S.Ct. 1860, 20 L.Ed.2d 869 (1968); United States v. Covello, 410 F. 2d 536 (2d Cir. 1969)…
• United States v. Gladney, 563 F.2d 491 (1st Cir. 1977)
  …cial surprise” is undercut by his refusal of a continuance. United States v. Cowles, 503 F. 2d 67 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113, 95 S.Ct. 790, 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975); United States v. Andrews, 381 F. 2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 1058,19 L.Ed.2d 1156 (1968). Gladney argues that a continuance would have “availed him naught” since his only possible attack on the tape was lack of consent and this required the presence of Lisa, who was unavailable. But nothing indica…