CLEMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States ex rel. Percy Rutherford v. Deegan, 406 F.2d 217 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …Wise v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 383 F. 2d 206 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 964, 88 S.Ct. 1069, 19 L.Ed.2d 1164 (1968) ; Crume v. Beto, 383 F. 2d 36 (5th Cir. 1967) ; United States v. Ball, 381 F. 2d 702 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 962, 88 S.Ct. 1066, 19 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1968) ; United States v. Beard, 381 F. 2d 325 (6th Cir. 1967) ; People v. Caruso, 68 Cal.2d 181, 65 Cal.Rptr. 336, 436 P. 2d 336 (1968) ; People v. Feggans, 67 Cal.2d 444, 62 Cal.Rptr. 419, 432 P. 2d 21 (1967) ; Comm…
• United States v. Armstrong, 654 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …h the jury asked about. Appellants, however, concede that the court could have allowed the Government to reopen its case for the purpose of introducing the requested exhibit. Morgan v. United States, 380 F. 2d 686, 703 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 962, 88 S.Ct. 1064, 19 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1968). Since the document referred to by the court was a copy of the unintroduced exhibit, there was no error. Several issues are raised only by Armstrong. We conclude that they are without merit. There was sufficien…
• United States v. Gibbons, 607 F.2d 1320 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …is a distinguishable case. Here we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion. In addition to a cautionary instruction to the jury, see generally Brown v. United States, 380 F. 2d 477, 479 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 962, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158; the court questioned the jurors in order to be satisfied that the statement had no prejudicial impact upon them. II R. 35. See generally United States v. Colabella, supra, 448 F. 2d at 1302-03; United States v. Evans…