HOFFER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• Sullivan v. Finkelstein, 496 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1990)
  …trict court may order a remand to the agency but the person seeking judicial review may seek to appeal on the ground that broader relief should have been granted by the district court, e. g., Bohms v. Gardner, 381 F. 2d 283 (CA8 1967), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 964 (1968). None of these situations are presented in this case, and we express no opinion about appealability in those circumstances. Specifically, the District Court noted that an Administrative Law Judge “found that the ‘medical findings shown in th…
• Russell v. United States, 408 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …5, supra. . We wish to make clear that the holding of this case approves only those on-the-scene identifications which occur within minutes of the witnessed crime. Cf. Wise v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 383 F. 2d 206 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 964, 88 S.Ct. 1069, 19 L.Ed.2d 1164 (1968) ; Bates v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 405 F. 2d 1104 (decided December 13, 1968). . See Biggers v. Tennessee, 390 U.S. 404, 407, 88 S.Ct. 979, 19 L.Ed.2d 1267 (dissenting opinion of Douglas, J.) ; Wri…
• Cohen v. Perales, 412 F.2d 44 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …antial evidence question, is without doubt an interlocutory order and is not appealable. Likewise, an order sua sponte by the court for the taking of additional evidence is not appealable. Bohms v. Gardner, 8 Cir., 1967, 381 F. 2d 283, cert. denied, 390 U.S. 964, 88 S.Ct. 1069, 19 L.Ed.2d 1164 (1968). In the case before us, the court not only denied the motions for summary judgment and reversed the decision of the Secretary, but also established standards for the admission of hearsay evidence and indicated…