ZSCHERNIG ET AL.

v.

MILLER, ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, 503 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1974)
  …are not extraterritorial; and no rule of comity requires a state to grant such licenses merely because a person has been admitted to practice in another state.” . See, Zschernig v. Miller (1968) 389 U.S. 429, 88 S.Ct. 664, 19 L.Ed.2d 683, reh. den. 390 U.S. 974, 88 S.Ct. 1018, 19 L.Ed.2d 1196; Lenhoff, Reciprocity: The Legal Aspects of a Perennial Idea, 49 N.W. Law R. 619 (1954). . In Sams, supra, the Court said : “Illustrative of this doctrine are the holdings that if there is a rational basis therefor,…
• Erich Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …wholly voluntary in nature and is not founded on case law which would require this court to implement such a policy. Ackerman v. United States, 293 F. 2d 449 (9th Cir. 1961); Armijo v. United States, 384 F. 2d 694 (9th Cir. 1967), certiorari denied, 390 U.S. 974, 88 S.Ct. 1074, 19 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1968). The eases which the appellant cited involve instances where a dismissal is requested by the United States of America. There has been no such request made by the United States of America in this case. The poli…
• Ippolito v. State, 824 F. Supp. 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993)