JAPANESE WAR NOTES CLAIMANTS ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES; AMPLEX OF MARYLAND, INC. V. OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.; HENRY V. DELHI-TAYLOR OIL CORP.; KLEIN ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; BIRNS V. OHIO; GATES V. P. F. COLLIER, INC.; OSBOURNE ET AL. V. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.; SKYLINE HOMES, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; PAULAITIS V. PAULAITIS; THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; BELL ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; MILLER V. HAINES, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE AND CORRECTION OF OHIO, ET AL.; RUTHERFORD ET AL. V. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.; JAMES, STATE TREASURER OF TEXAS, ET AL. V. GILMORE ET AL.; E. W. BUSCHMAN CO. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; ZUCKERMAN ET AL. V. GREASON, ALLINSON V. GREASON,

Citator

Cited By

• Stanford Monroe Welcker v. The United States, 752 F.2d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
  …the running of the statute will be suspended when an accrual date has been ascertained, but plaintiff does not know of his claim.” Japanese War Notes Claimants Association v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 630, 373 F. 2d 356, 358-59 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 975, 88 S.Ct. 466, 19 L.Ed.2d 461 (1968). As a judicial interpretation of a legislative enactment, the rule is strictly and narrowly applied: “Plaintiff must either show that defendant has concealed its acts with the result that plaintiff was unaware of…
• Hooten v. United States, 405 F.2d 1167 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …hold that Hooten is not entitled to compensation for the contracts lost as a result of the takings in fee. See Klein v. United States, 1967, 375 F. 2d 825, 829, 179 Ct.Cl. 910, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1037, 88 S.Ct. 770, 19 L.Ed.2d 824, reh. denied, 390 U.S. 975, 88 S.Ct. 1023, 19 L.Ed.2d 1192. The judgment of the district court is Affirmed. . The Chamizal is an area of land on the north bank of the Rio Grande, within the pity limits of El Paso, Texas. Because of the change in the course of the river to t…