MARYLAND ET AL.
v.
WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

U.S. | 1968-03-11
No. 742
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
390 U.S. 978 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bright v. Rhay, 391 F.2d 915 (9th Cir. 1968)
    …uance of a writ of habeas corpus when release from confinement would not result because applicant is held on a separate, valid conviction. . This ease, which is No. 802 on the Supreme Court’s calendar for this Term under the name of Peyton v. Rowe, 390 U.S. 978, 88 S.Ct. 1096, 19 L.Ed.2d 1275, was argued on March 27, 1968.…
  • Ragsdale v. Beto, 395 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1968)
    …PER CURIAM: The judgment of the District Court is reversed and remanded for further consideration in the light of Peyton v. Rowe, 390 U.S. 978, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426. Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw