MCMANIGAL

v.

SIMON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Troiano v. Troiano, 549 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …f a contract for the sale of land has been held to be transitory rather than local. Royal v. Parado, 462 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Wheatland Hills Corporation v. Morton, 199 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 204 So. 2d 332 (Fla.1967) and 390 U.S. 980, 88 S.Ct. 1099, 19 L.Ed.2d 1276 (1968). Francolino also cites to language in Lake-land: “From a very early period, courts of equity having jurisdiction of the person of the party have exercised the power to compel him to perform a contract, execut…
• Steebe v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 708 F.2d 250 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …(c) explicitly limits review of the Board’s decision made under that subsection to judicial review as provided for in subsection (f). 45 U.S.C. § 355(c); Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. Habermeyer, 382 F. 2d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 980, 88 S.Ct. 1101, 19 L.Ed.2d 1277 (1968). As a further limitation on the review of Board decisions, subsection (g) of section 355 provides that “[1] [findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board in the determination of any claim for benefits o…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Booth v. Lemont MFG. Corp., 440 F.2d 385 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …is clear, however, that § 1343 confers jurisdiction upon claims based [*387] upon infringement of “personal rights” not property rights. Ream v. Handley, 359 F. 2d 728 (7th Cir. 1966); McManigal v. Simon, 382 F. 2d 408 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 980, 88 S.Ct. 1099, 19 L.Ed.2d 1276 (1968). We find that plaintiff’s claim for a reassessment of the rental value of the District property is a claim based on alleged property rights, whether equitable or legal, and not recognizable under § 1343(3). Bo…