WILKES

v.

FLORIDA BAR

Citator

Cited By

• Guiseppe Pizzeria v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 472 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …ed to follow. Comity and full faith and credit do not require us to recognize and enforce a New York judgment of disbarment, or another state’s decision to admit one to its bar. See The Florida Bar v. Wilkes, 179 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1965), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 983, 88 S.Ct. 1104, 19 L.Ed.2d 1280 (1968). Neither, then, do those principles require us to recognize and enforce a New York decision to issue a liquor license. Since Porto’s civil rights have not been fully restored in any jurisdiction, we find that…
• Williams v. United States, 418 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …t in order to allow the arrestee to enter the premises which the officer desires to search. (Compare McKnight v. United States (1950) 87 U.S.App.D.C. 151, 183 F. 2d 977, with United States v. Weaver (4th Cir. 1967) 384 F. 2d 879, cert. denied (1968) 390 U.S. 983, 88 S.Ct. 1106, 19 L.Ed.2d 1282.) There is ample evidence to sustain the District Court’s finding that the arrest was not a pretext for the search. The search for contraband was related to the nature and purpose of the arrest. The delay in obtainin…
• United States v. Jones, 696 F.2d 479 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …isbet and arrested him at poolside within the short time before he went to his room. The other cases cited by the defendants, Harris v. United States, 321 F. 2d 739 (6th Cir.1963); United States v. Weaver, 384 F. 2d 879 (4th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 983, 88 S.Ct. 1106, 19 L.Ed.2d 1282 (1968); and Williams v. United States, 418 F. 2d 159 (9th Cir.1969), aff’d, 401 U.S. 646, 91 S.Ct. 1148, 28 L.Ed.2d 388 (1971), among others, also do not persuade us that the delay here was wrongful.3 A delay of sixt…