ZAVALA

v.

CRAVEN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …m that part of the opinion which holds that the privilege is [*1330] governed by federal rather than state law. Such a decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Eighth Circuit in Love v. United States, 1967, 386 F. 2d 260, cert. denied 390 U.S. 985. I concur in the result because I believe that Tucker v. United States, which started this whole business, should, itself, be overruled. The Tucker panel, 409 F. 2d at 1295, remanded Woodall’s plea and directed a hearing in the District Court becau…
• United States v. Brickey, 426 F.2d 680 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …ing of the $75,000 check and Brickey maintains this violated his attorney-client privilege. We recognize the confidential communication privilege of attorney and client, [*685] Love v. United States, 386 F. 2d 260, 265 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 985, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1968), but no confidential communication was violated in this case. Acts or services done by an attorney for his client in the course of his employment do not come within the privilege because no private professional…
• United States v. Cochran, 475 F.2d 1080 (8th Cir. 1973)
  …Two), John Dorrell III (Count Three), and Mr. and Mrs. Darían and Mr. and Mrs. Greenlee (Count Four). . A state murder charge was nolle prossed after this action was tried. . Love v. United States, 386 F. 2d 260, 266 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 985, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1968). . United States v. Stubblefield, 408 F. 2d 309, 310 (6th Cir. 1969). . The District Attorney did not accuse the defendant of lying. He sought to elicit from the doctor that he relied on information furnished…