MANSON

v.

INDIANA; AND SUBER V. INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Morgan Precision Parts v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 444 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …in any event, an error of this character could not overturn a Board decision unless there were substantial prejudice to the challenging party. N.L.R.B. v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Company of Georgia, 383 F. 2d 273, 276-77 (C.A. 5, 1967), cert denied, 390 U.S. 995, [*1215] 88 S.Ct. 1052, 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968). We find no such prejudice in this instance. The company has not shown any specific detriment from the Board’s refusal of pre-trial discovery, and its claims of prejudice are all overly general, undocu…
• Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF the Cnty. OF Custer v. Wilshire OIL Co. OF Tex., 523 F.2d 125 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …967); Philadelphia v. Morton Salt Co., 289 F.Supp. 723 (E.D.Pa.1968); Hawkins v. National Basketball Ass’n, 288 F.Supp. 614 (W.D.Pa.1968); New York v. Morton Salt Co., 266 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1967), aff’d, 385 F. 2d 122 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 995, 88 S.Ct. 1195, 20 L.Ed.2d 94 (1968). . Philadelphia Housing Auth. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 291 F.Supp. 252 (E.D.Pa.1968) (court found that the defendant, however, did not reside in any district in the state); Hawkins v. Nati…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Med. Ctr. AT Bowling Green v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 712 F.2d 1091 (6th Cir. 1983)
  …the Board’s administrative expertise in resolving disputes concerning supervisory status, its decisions will usually not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion. See NLRB v. Corral Sportswear Co., 383 F. 2d 961, 965 (10th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 995, 88 S.Ct. 1196, 20 L.Ed.2d 94 (1968). Because the record does not reveal a manifest abuse of that discretion, the Board’s decision to allow the unit directors to vote subject to challenge is appropriate. Such a practice enables the Board to conduct…