JOHNSON

v.

BENNETT, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Kaufman v. United States, 394 U.S. 217 (U.S. 1969)
  …entence under § 2255 but can only be properly presented by appeal from the conviction.” 3 Other courts of appeals have indicated a contra [*221]-ry view.4 In light of the importance of the issue in the administration of § 2255 we granted certiorari. 390 U. S. 1002 (1968). We reverse. The authority of the federal courts to issue the writ of habeas corpus was incorporated in the very first grant of federal court jurisdiction made by the Judiciary Act of 1789, c. 20, § 14, 1 Stat. 81, with the limiting provisio…
• Reg'l Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1974)
  …e appropriated for public use, and that the values inherent in its assemblage as an operating railroad will [*167] be recognized and paid for. Cf. Port Authority Trans. Hudson Corp. v. Hudson Rapid Tubes, 20 N. Y. 2d 457, 231 N. E. 734, cert. denied 390 U. S. 1002 (1967).” 383 F. Supp. 510, 537 (ED Pa. 1974). (Footnote omitted.) Section 207 (c), 45 U. S. C. § 717(c) (1970 ed., Supp. Ill), required the executive committee of USRA to present the final system plan to USRA’s board of directors for approval withi…
• New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)
  …not disclose whether payment of liquidating value would have yielded a higher price. In In re Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp., 20 N. Y. 2d 457, 231 N. E. 2d 734, cert. denied sub nom. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corp., 390 U. S. 1002, the Court of Appeals dealt with a public taking of railroad tunnels under the Hudson River owned by a company in reorganization and having only a “dim financial future ....’’ 20 N. Y. 2d, at 465, 231 N. E. 2d, at 736. The tunnels, which required on…