BROWN

v.

CLIFFORD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Golden v. State, 429 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …ls. With that authentication the enhanced copies — as we shall refer to them— were as competent as the originals and more probative. See Fountain v. United States, 384 F. 2d 624, 631 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied sub. nom., Marshall v. United States, 390 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 1246, 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968). Golden then complains that despite Hol-brook’s efforts the two enhanced recording copies were largely inaudible. When the State first played the September 26 recording to the jury through loud speakers, the co…
• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …fendants’ inability to complete their inquiry created a “substantial danger of prejudice by depriving [them] of the ability to test the truth of the witness’s direct testimony.” Fountain v. United States, 384 F. 2d 624, 628 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1005 [88 S.Ct. 1246, 20 L.Ed.2d 105]. It is generally only where the witness refuses [*1028] to answer on “direct” as opposed to “collateral” matters that his direct testimony must be excised. Id. United States v. Diecidue, 603 F. 2d 535, 552 (5th Cir.…
• United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …fendants’ inability to complete their inquiry created a “substantial danger of prejudice by depriving [them] of the ability to test the truth of the witness’s direct testimony.” Fountain v. United States, 384 F. 2d 624, 628 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 1246, 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968). It is generally only where the witness refuses to answer on “direct” as opposed to “collateral” matters that his direct testimony must be excised. Id. Defendants were not hampered in testing the truth of Norie…