JOHNSON
v.
PATE, WARDEN; PULIDO V. CALIFORNIA; PARKER V. MARYLAND ET AL.; WHITE V. PEYTON, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; O'TOOLE V. SCAFATI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT; GERBERDING V. TAHASH, WARDEN

U.S. | 1968-04-08
Nos. 524; No. 569; No. 883; No. 1012; No. 1118; No 1164
390 U.S. 1018 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ontract was utilized to foster or promote an unlawful competitive scheme, the appellees were free to invoke it. . We are not impressed with appellants’ contention that Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 869, 19 L.Ed.2d 998, reh. denied, 390 U.S. 1018, 88 S.Ct. 1258, 20 L.Ed.2d 169 (1968), is “a case virtually identical to” their case here. We perceive that there are crucial differences between the cases. In Albrecht the Supreme Court held that an illegal restraint of trade under Section 1 of the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw