TUCKY

v.

CASTLE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1973)
  …rev’d on confession of error by the Solicitor General, 366 U. S. 716 (1961) (§§ 7201 and 7207); Lumetta v. United States, 362 F. 2d 644, 646 n. 3 (CA8 1966) (§§ 7201 and [*349] 7203); Escobar v. United States, 388 F. 2d 661 (CA5 1967), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 1024 (1968) (§§ 7206 (1) and 7207). Other inconsistencies in interpreting the word "willfully” have compounded the confusion. See n. 8, infra. Cf. United States v. Lachmann, 469 F. 2d 1043 (CA1 1972) (§§7201 and 7203). United States v. Haseltine, 419 F.…
• United States v. Solomon Gaines, 690 F.2d 849 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …it in any of these contentions. Gaines’ first argument concerning the lesser included offense instruction has been squarely foreclosed by precedent binding upon this court.12 In Escobar v. United States, 388 F. 2d 661 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968), the former fifth circuit stated that a “lesser-included offense instruction is only proper where the charged greater offense requires the jury to find a disputed factual element which is not required for convic…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Vicente Carrodeguas, 747 F.2d 1390 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …e jury that a violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7207 is a lesser included offense of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7206(1). This contention is foreclosed by the decisions of this Court in Escobar v. [*1396] United States, 388 F. 2d 661, 666 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968), and United States v. Gaines, 690 F. 2d 849, 856 (11th Cir.1982), which note the only difference between the two statutes is the requirement in Section 7206 that a false statement be made “under the penalties of…