NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
CRAWFORD MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL.; AND AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
CRAWFORD MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL.; AND AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
390 U.S. 1028
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Caution
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1969)…se portions of the Board’s orders directing the respondent companies to bargain in good faith. The court based its § 8 (a) (5) rulings on its 1967 decisions raising the same fundamental issues, Crawford Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 386 F. 2d 367, cert. denied, 390 U. S. 1028 (1968) ; NLRB v. Logan Packing Co., 386 F. 2d 562; NLRB v. Sehon Stevenson & Co., Inc., 386 F. 2d 551. The court in those cases held that the 1947 Taft-Hartley amendments to the Act, which permitted the Board to resolve representation disputes by ce…
-
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Perini N. River Assocs., 459 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1983)…l); Ford v. Parker, 52 F. Supp. 98 (Md. 1943) (night watchman); Perry v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc., 202 So. 2d 694 (La. App. 1967) (worker injured while diving in order to assist in construction of a tunnel under intracoastal canal), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 1028 (1968). This list is by no means exhaustive, and does not include various administrative decisions. In another case, Pennsylvania R. Co. v. O’Rourke, 344 U. S. 334 (1953), we held that a statutory “employer” existed as long as the employer had an…
-
In re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Lavien, 737 F.2d 1254 (2d Cir. 1984)…S.Ct. 1502, 1513 n. 16, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960); Ferguson v. Gathright, 485 F. 2d 504, 506 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 933, 94 S.Ct. 1447, 39 L.Ed.2d 491 (1974); Madera v. Board of Education, 386 F. 2d 778, 780 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1028, 88 S.Ct. 1416, 20 L.Ed.2d 284 (1968). In non-criminal cases federal courts have the authority to appoint counsel, but generally they are not required to do so. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); see Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F. 2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1982), cert. d…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence