MARVEL SPECIALTY CO., INC.

v.

BELL HOSIERY MILLS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Underwater Devices Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
  …egal advice from counsel before the initiation of any possible infringing activity. See General Electric, supra, at 1073-74, 163 USPQ at 261; Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., 386 F. 2d 287, 155 USPQ 545 (4th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1030, 88 S.Ct. 1409, 20 L.Ed.2d 286 (1968). In this case, M-K obtained its counsel’s advice after it commenced its infringing activities. Although Mr. Schlanger did order a patent search and received the results of that search in late 1973, he did not ev…
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc., 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …ow recovery of damages,” id. 505, 84 S.Ct. 1542, and we do not find the case controlling as to the interest issue before' us. But cf. Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., 386 F. 2d 287, 290 & n. 3 (4th Cir. 1967) (semble), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1030, 88 S.Ct. 1409, 20 L.Ed.2d 286 (1968). . GP also argues that the same scenario took place with respect to the 1952 codification of the patent laws. It correctly states that the House initially proffered “interest from the beginning of the infringem…
• Milgo Elec. Corp. v. United Bus. Commc'ns, Inc., 623 F.2d 645 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …of the trial court’s discretion. Blake v. Bassick Co., 392 F. 2d 879, 883 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 828, 89 S.Ct. 94, 21 L.Ed.2d 100 (1968); Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., 386 F. 2d 287, 292 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1030, 88 S.Ct. 1409, 20 L.Ed.2d 286 (1968). UBC contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s findings that Rixon copied the Milgo modem and that Rixon/UBC had actual notice of infringement on the date that the Whang ’023 patent i…