BIGGERS

v.

TENNESSEE; ANDERSON V. JOHNSON, WARDEN; BANCO NACIONAL DE CUBA V. FARR ET AL., DBA FARR, WHITLOCK & CO., ET AL.; POWELL V. NATIONAL SAVINGS & TRUST CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Biggers v. Neil, 448 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …nted, 388 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 2132, 18 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1967), and the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee by an equally divided Court. Biggers v. Tennessee, 390 U.S. 404, 88 S.Ct. 979, 19 L.Ed.2d 1267 (1967), reh. den. 390 U.S. 1037, 88 S.Ct. 1401, 20 L.Ed.2d 298 (1967). Petitioner then brought this action for a writ of habeas corpus. The District Court granted the writ, basing its decision to set aside petitioner’s state conviction upon its conclusion that the totality of ci…
• Monnich v. Kropp, 408 F.2d 356 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …istrict Court sitting without a jury, is that the findings of fact will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous. Anderson v. Johnson, 371 F. 2d 84, 89 (6th Cir. 1966), affirmed 389 U.S. 819, 88 S.Ct. 109, 19 L.Ed.2d 69 (1968), reh. denied 390 U.S. 1037, 88 S.Ct. 1402, 20 L.Ed.2d 298 (1968) ; Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After a careful reading of the transcript taken at the evidentiary hearing, we find that the question pertaining to “reasonable diligence” was dealt with fully by…