PRESTON

v.

TYNER

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• de Arroyo v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packinghouse, AFL-CIO, 425 F.2d 281 (1st Cir. 1970)
  …ranted. . E. g., Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 186 F. 2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951) (attorney’s fees awarded to employee for [*293] union’s breach of duty of fair representation); Gartner v. Soloner, 384 F. 2d 348 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1040, 88 S.Ct. 1633, 20 L.Ed.2d 302 (1968) (attorney’s fees to union member under § 102, LMRDA); Sheet Metal Workers, International Association Local 223 v. Atlas Sheet Metal Co., 384 F. 2d 101, 109-110 (5th Gir. 1967) (attorney’s fees awarded to employe…
• Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. of the United States, 747 F.2d 878 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …propriate for the court to consider the purpose of its enactment and the problem to be eradicated, and to recognize a construction that would best effectuate those goals. See, e.g., Gartner v. Soloner, 384 F. 2d 348, 355 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1040, 88 S.Ct. 1633, 20 L.Ed.2d 302 (1968). For example, in Ocasio, 540 F.Supp. at 1323, the district court emphasized that the “Agency’s error forced the plaintiff and her attorneys into this court, and their persistance resulted in correction of the…
• Yablonski v. United Mine Workers of Am., 466 F.2d 424 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …judicial power to award legal fees in LMRDA litigation, and, in a decision which appellees recognize to be squarely contrary to that of the District Court, has rejected that position. Gartner v. Soloner, 384 F. 2d 348 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1040, 88 S.Ct. 1633, 20 L.Ed.2d 302 (1968). After examining the legislative history in [*430] depth, the court found no fixed purpose on the part of Congress to restrict the equity jurisdiction of the district courts in such manner as to bar counsel fe…