BRANIGIN ET AL.
v.
DUDDLESTON ET AL.

U.S. | 1968-05-20
No. 1252
Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.
391 U.S. 364 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 641 · 88 S. Ct. 1666 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646 · SCDB 1967-133
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Skolnick v. Bd. OF Comm'rs OF Cook Cnty., 435 F.2d 361 (7th Cir. 1970)
    …al. Corp. v. Harjean Co., 284 F. Supp. 843, 854 (N.D.Tex.1968). . E. g„ Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 349 U.S. 1, 75 S.Ct. 553, 99 L.Ed. 773 (1955) ; Grills v. Branigin, 284 F.Supp. 176 (S.D.Ind.), aff’d mem., sub nom. Branigin v. Duddleston, 391 U.S. 364, 88 S.Ct. 1666, 20 L.Ed.2d 641 (1968) ; Baker v. Clement, 247 F.Supp. 886 (M.D. Tenn.1965) ; Daniel v. Davis, 220 F. Supp. 601 (E.D.La.1963). . 369 U.S. 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703; accord, Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 99-100, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw