CHARLES R. ASHMANN
v.
STATE
CHARLES R. ASHMANN
STATE
192 So. 2d 496
Florida Supreme Court (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari denied without opinion. 184 So.2d 697.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Atl. Nat'l Bank OF Fla. v. Vest, 480 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…er Mall, Inc. v. [*1331] Carson, 327 So. 2d 121, (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 344 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1977). Even construing all testimony in a light most favorable to Vest, see Paiken v. Beach Cabs, Inc., 187 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 192 So. 2d 496 (Fla.1966), we find the trial court erred in not directing a verdict for the bank. Indemnity has been generally defined as a right that inures to a person who has discharged a duty that is owed by him but which, as between himself and another, shou…
-
Ferby v. State, 404 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…281 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Whitlow v. State, 256 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); and the sufficiency of the evidence. See, e.g., Robinson v. State, 194 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Brooks v. State, 188 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 192 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1966). The defendant claims he was inadequately and ineffectually represented by his trial counsel of record because his counsel: did not call his codefendant and other witnesses to testify; failed to take depositions; failed to properly cro…
Authorities Cited
- Ashmann v. State, 184 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)