LEAR, INC.

v.

ADKINS

Citator

Cited By

• Oestereich v. Selective Serv. Sys. Local Bd. NO. 11, 393 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1968)
  …ction. At that point he brought suit to restrain his induction. The District Court dismissed the complaint, 280 F. Supp. 78, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 390 F. 2d 100. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 391 U. S. 912. As noted, § 6 (g) of the Act states that “students preparing for the ministry” in qualified schools “shall be exempt from training and service” under the Act.3 Equally unambiguous is § 10 (b) (3) of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 81 S…
• Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (U.S. 1969)
  …e that his licensor was demanding royalties for the use of an idea which was in reality a part of the public domain. Automatic Radio Manufacturing Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 339 U. S. 827, 836 (1950). We granted certiorari in the present case, 391 U. S. 912, to reconsider the validity of the Hazeltine rule in the light of our recent decisions emphasizing the strong federal policy favoring free competition in ideas which do not merit patent protection. Sears, Roebuck v. Stiffel Co., 376 U. S. 225 (1964)…
• Sloan v. Local Bd. NO. 1, 414 F.2d 125 (10th Cir. 1969)
  …1969. Affirmed. . 50 U.S.C.App. § 460(b) (3). . 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968). . Page 11 of the Solicitor’s memorandum filed in the Supreme Court in No. 1246, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, et al., 391 U.S. 912, 88 S.Ct. 1804, 20 L.Ed.2d 651. . Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 11, 393 U.S. 233, 239, 89 S.Ct. 414, 417, 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968). . 393 U.S. 256, 89 S.Ct. 424, 21 L.Ed.2d 418 (1968). . Id. at 258, 89 S.Ct. at 426. . Id. .…