GENERAL FOODS CORP.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Sterling Drug Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 450 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …eedom of Information Act, we must require a remand. Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. . General Foods Corp., 68 F.T.C. 581 (Dkt., 8600 1966), aff’d sub nom. General Foods Corp. v. FTC, 386 F. 2d 936 (3d Cir. 1967), cert, den., 391 U.S. 919, 88 S.Ct. 1805, 20 L.Ed.2d 657 (1968). . Sterling charges that this failure was a violation of section 5(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 555 (e) (1964), which provides: Prompt notice shall be given of the denial in whole or in p…
• S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., 456 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1982)
  …S. C. § 11901(a) (1976 ed., Supp. [*350] III), for each knowing violation of an order of the Commission, see, e. g., United States v. Western Pacific R. Co., 385 F. 2d 161 (CA10 1967), cert. denied sub nom. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. United States, 391 U. S. 919 (1968); United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 308 F. Supp. 293 (ED Pa. 1969). Thus, the ICC may regulate the credit practices of carriers even without the judicially created remedy of forfeiture of freight charges. Furthermore, a reading of the cit…
• Mo. Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, 498 F.2d 851 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …, see, e. g., Ekco Products Co. v. FTC, 347 F. 2d 745 (7 Cir. 1965) (acquiring firm’s financial resources used to maintain merged firm’s monopoly position in its market) ; General [*866] Foods Corp. v. FTC, 386 F. 2d 936 (3 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 919, 88 S.Ct. 1805, 20 L.Ed.2d 657 (1908) (product-extension merger in which General Foods’ power in the household market would endanger the balanced duopoly in the steel wool soap pad market) ; United States Steel Corp. v. FTC, 426 F. 2d 592 (6 Cir. 19…