SHIFFMAN

v.

SELECTIVE SERVICE LOCAL BOARD NO. 5 ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rolf J. Kolden v. Selective Serv. Local Bd. NO. 4, 406 F.2d 631 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …e regulations establishing a delinquency procedure as well as the regulation specifying the circumstances under which deferments will be granted. It further contends that the Supreme Court’s denial of stay in Shiffman v. Selective Service Bd. No. 5, 391 U.S. 930, 88 S.Ct. 1831, 20 L.Ed.2d 849 (1968), represents an acceptance of this distinction. In SMffman, registrant, who was declared a delinquent when he destroyed his draft card, and was reclassified from II-S to I-A, was denied an injunction against his…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, 410 F.2d 492 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …e much larger reserve of manpower subject to the draft. While the Supreme Court has not, as the length of this opinion evidences, spoken directly to the issue before us, we draw support from its actions in Shiffman v. Selective Service Board No. 5, 391 U.S. 930, 88 S.Ct. 1831, 20 L.Ed.2d 849 (1968) and Zigmond v. Selective Service Board No. 16, 391 U.S. 930, 88 S.Ct. 1831, 20 L.Ed.2d 851 (1968). In Shiftman the petitioner who held a II-A occupational deferment was declared delinquent and reclassified I-A w…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• The Reverend Henry Hale Bucher, Jr. v. Selective Serv. Sys., 421 F.2d 24 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …93 (6th Cir. 1969), petition for cert. filed, 38 U.S.L. Week 3094 (U.S. Aug. 8, 1969) (449) ; Rich v. Hershey, 408 F. 2d 944 (10 Cir. 1969). Cf. Zigmond v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 396 F. 2d 290 (1 Cir. 1968), petition for stay denied, 391 U.S. 930, 88 S.Ct. 1831, 20 L.Ed.2d 851, Justice Douglas dissenting. We note, additionally, that the Government has cited Kolden v. Selective Service Local Board No. 4, Beltrami County, Minn., 406 F. 2d 631 (8 Cir. 1969), petition for cert. filed, 38 U.S.L.…