WINKER

v.

BURKE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Lowther v. United States, 455 F.2d 657 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …isagree. Each count in an indictment is a separate offense and consistency in the verdict is not necessary. Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); Speers v. United States, 387 F. 2d 698 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 391 U.S. 956, 88 S.Ct. 1864, '20 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Maxfield v. United States, 360 F. 2d 97 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 830, 87 S.Ct. 67, 17 L.Ed.2d 66 (1966); Burns v. United States, 286 F. 2d 152 (10th Cir. 1961). Furthermore the Jolkovsky transa…
• United States v. Mac von Roeder, 435 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …ror for the trial court not to adequately present a defendant’s theory of the case if the instruction is properly tendered and is supported by the evidence. Speers v. United States, 387 F. 2d 698 (10th Cir.1967), cert. den., Sidary v. United States, 391 U.S. 956, 88 S.Ct. 1864, 20 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968). The issue here is whether or not the evidence and the law support appellant’s theory of the case. We think they do not. All evidence concerning appellant Schreiner indicates his participation in the escape phas…
• United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …ranting of a request for a subpoena of witnesses at government expense is not an absolute right, but rather rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(b); Speers v. United States, 387 F. 2d 698 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 956, 88 S.Ct. 1864, 20 L.Ed.2d 871; Findley v. United States, 380 F. 2d 752 (10th Cir. 1967). Under the circumstances, we find no abuse of the court’s discretion in its denial of the pretrial motions and the record shows no prejudice therefrom. Next…