MAIER BREWING CO. ET AL.

v.

FLEISCHMANN DISTILLING CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., 768 F.2d 1001 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …and may order an accounting or award punitive damages and fines where the injunctive relief has proven insufficient to protect trademark rights. See Maier Brewing Co. v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., 390 F. 2d 117, 123 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 966, 88 S.Ct. 2037, 20 L.Ed.2d 879 (1968) (both the trademark owner and the buying public are slighted if the court provides no greater remedy than an injunction). The judgment is AFFIRMED. . The defendants also present a general challenge to the adeq…
• Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …e infringing acts have taken place “in commerce” which is subject to congressional regulation, but that the acts have an adverse effect on that commerce. Maier Brewing Co. v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., 390 F. 2d 117, 120 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 966, 88 S.Ct. 2037, 20 L.Ed.2d 879 (1968); Franchised Stores of New York, Inc. v. Winter, 394 F. 2d 664, 669-70 (2d Cir. 1968). See 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (intent of Congress). In the context of those cases, the courts held that purely intrastate infringi…
• The W. E. Bassett Co. v. Revlon, Inc., 435 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …hawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co., supra, Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916); Maier Brewing Co. v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., 390 F. 2d 117 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 391 U.S. 966, 88 S.Ct. 2037, 20 L.Ed.2d 879 (1968). Revlon would be unjustly enriched here if its sales of the “Cuti-Trim” implements were attributable to its infringing use of Bassett’s name. On the record as a whole, however, it appears that Revlon’s sales of…