FIELDS

v.

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Guajardo-Melendez, 401 F.2d 35 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …stions concerning his alleged conversation with Agent Azzam, whether asked by Santoya’s counsel on cross-examination or after Henandez had been recalled as a witness. . In United States v. Bujese, 378 F. 2d 719 (2d Cir. 1967), vacated and remanded, 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1968), the Supreme Court remanded a case (strikingly similar to the instant one) for further consideration in light of Bruton. In Bujese a co-defendant pleaded not guilty and took the stand to testify in his own beha…
• Baker v. Louie L. Wainwright, 422 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …confessing defendant took the stand and was subject to cross-examination.8 The only case we find where the confessing co-defendant took the stand and Bruton’s rule was still applied is Bujese v. United States, 378 F. 2d 719 (2nd Cir. 1967); vacated 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1968); rev. 405 F. 2d 888 (2d Cir.1969). In that case Bujese’s co-defendant testified in their joint trial and, after being confronted with his written confession on cross-examination, admitted he had committed the r…
• United States v. Sims, 430 F.2d 1089 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …92 U.S. 301, 88 S.Ct. 2054, 20 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1968), on rehearing, 402 F. 2d 920, 922 (1968), holding Bruton doesn’t apply under these circumstances; but cf. United States v. Bujese, 378 F. 2d 719 (2nd Cir. 1967), cert. granted, vacated and remanded, 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed. 2d 1113 (1968); on rehearing, 405 F. 2d 888 (1969), holding Bruton applies even under these circumstances, but see United States v. Catino, 403 F. 2d 491, 496 (1968), also in the Second Circuit which indicates that Bruton wo…