BOGART
v.
CALIFORNIA
BOGART
CALIFORNIA
392 U.S. 298
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sweetser v. State, 258 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…ath of the deceased with any degree of medical certainty? “A Well, it will cause unconsciousness. That is why I had written out death occurred due to traumatic injuries of the head and neck which killed the individual.” . Vacated on other grounds, 392 U.S. 298, 88 S.Ct. 2067, 20 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1968) after remand Fla.1968, 215 So. 2d 611, cert. gr. 403 U.S. 952, 91 S.Ct. 2279, 29 L.Ed.2d 863 (June 28, 1971).…
-
Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (U.S. 1972)…oth of them in the murder. Both defendants were convicted, and the Florida Supreme Court affirmed. This Court vacated and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968). Schneble v. Florida, 392 U. S. 298 (1968). Upon remand, the Supreme Court of Florida reversed Snell's conviction, finding that it had been obtained in violation of Bruton, but affirmed petitioner's conviction. We again granted certiorari, limited* to the question of whether petitione…1 / 2
-
United States v. Donald E. Belle. Appeal of Donald Belle, 593 F.2d 487 (3d Cir. 1979)…Search of a Theory, 7 Rut.-Cam.L.J. 43, 63, 74 (1975). . As recently as 1972, the Supreme Court suggested the possibility that linkage testimony may, in a particular case, violate the Confrontation Clause. See the decisions in Schneble v. Florida, 392 U.S. 298, 88 S.Ct. 2067, 20 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1968), 405 U.S. 427, 92 S.Ct. 1056, 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972). Petitioner in Schneble was convicted of murder after a trial in which a statement by his nontestifying codefendant was introduced. The statement located pe…1 / 2