SANTORO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1968-06-10
No. 1219
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968)., Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
392 U.S. 301 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106 · 88 S. Ct. 2054 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362 · SCDB 1967-172
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rosalind Fogel and Gerald Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100 (2d Cir. 1981)
    …ellants, protected by the “unless clearly erroneous” provision [*117] of F.R.Civ.P. 53(e)(2). See, e.g., United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly Corp., 377 F. 2d 872, 874 n.2 (2 Cir. 1967) (Rule 52(a)), rev’d on other grounds, 392 U.S. 390, 88 S.Ct. 2054, 20 L.Ed.2d 1176 (1968); NLRB v. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., 587 F. 2d 212, 220 (5 Cir. 1979); 5A Moore’s Federal Practice K1Í 52.03[2], 53.12[5] (2d ed. 1980) (Rules 52(a), 53(e)(2)).14 We therefore sustain the district court’s computation of…
  • Santoro v. United States, 402 F.2d 920 (9th Cir. 1968)
    …t granted a writ of certiorari in the present case, vacated the judgment of this court, and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476. Santoro v. United States, 392 U.S. 301, 88 S.Ct. 2054, 20 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1968). Bruton was made retroactive in Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1968). Santoro, together with Joseph Coduto, Peter LaMagna and Dorothy Haynes, was engaged in marketing stolen…
  • United States v. Sims, 430 F.2d 1089 (6th Cir. 1970)
    …stances, have an opportunity to cross-examine the codefendant. It appears that several other Circuits are also in disagreement on this question. See e. g., Santoro v. United States, 388 F. 2d 113 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. granted, vacated and remanded, 392 U.S. 301, 88 S.Ct. 2054, 20 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1968), on rehearing, 402 F. 2d 920, 922 (1968), holding Bruton doesn’t apply under these circumstances; but cf. United States v. Bujese, 378 F. 2d 719 (2nd Cir. 1967), cert. granted, vacated and remanded, 392 U.S. 29…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw